Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Adam Bray v. Susan Wilkey, et al
as 23-2080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM BRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN WILKEY, Deputy, GREGORY DOMMER, Deputy and JOHN ALEXANDER, Deputy
Adam Bray v. Susan Wilkey, et al
as 23-1849
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM BRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN WILKEY, Deputy, GREGORY DOMMER, Deputy and JOHN ALEXANDER, Deputy
Adam Bray v. Westville Correctional Center, et al
as 22-1151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM BRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
WESTVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, JOHN GALIPEAU, MR. WATTS and others
Bray - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Westville Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility, Galipeau, Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Shiparski et al
as 3:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
ADAM BRAY
Defendant:
OFFICER Kyle Shiparski, OFFICER WILLIE HENDERSON, OFFICER Adam Brinkman and others
Not Classified By Court:
Galen A. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BRAY v. RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER et al
as 1:2021cv02522
Defendant:
HAWK, MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM BRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Boyd et al
as 3:2021cv00215
Defendant:
John T Boyd and Tiger Correctional Services
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Quality Correctional Care LLC
as 3:2021cv00186
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Care LLC
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. LaPorte County of Indiana et al
as 3:2020cv01056
Defendant:
John Lake, Michael S Bergerson, LaPorte County of Indiana and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. LaPorte Indiana County of et al
as 3:2020cv01003
Defendant:
Jimerson, John Lake, Tiger Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
