Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Gomez v. Garza
as 24-40271
Plaintiff:
Adam M. Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Garza, Cameron County Sheriff, Robert Gracia, Cameron County Chief Deputy Sheriff, Cameron County and others
Moser et al v. Club Car Wash Operating, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04058
Plaintiff:
David Moser and Richard Adams
Defendant:
Club Car Wash Operating, LLC and Roland Bartels
Lawhon v. KeHE Distributors, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Adam Lawhon
Defendant:
KeHE Distributors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Adam Lawhon v. KeHe Distributors Inc.
as 5:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Adam Lawhon
Defendant:
KeHe Distributors, Inc. and KeHe Distributors Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Bakhtiari v. Kahn et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Ali Bakhtiari
Defendant:
Jeffery Kahn, Adam Kahn, Meagen Denormandie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Rakowicz et al v. ABM Industry Groups, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09254
Plaintiff:
Waldemar Rakowicz, Roman Karwan, Adam Koniarz and others
Defendant:
ABM Industry Groups, LLC and UG2 LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Adam McLean, et al v. Delta Air Lines Inc.
as 23-13373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM MCLEAN and JAMES DOYLE
Defendant / Appellee:
DELTA AIR LINES INC.
FLORES v. OCEAN LED USA, LLC
as 0:2023cv61842
Plaintiff:
ADAM FLORES
Defendant:
OCEAN LED USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment or Reemployment Rights Act - Discrimination
Mullings v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
Adam Mullings
Defendant:
A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Sutton v. Adams et al
as 2:2023cv02253
Plaintiff:
Rick Sutton and Rick M Sutton
Defendant:
Jack Adams and Maison Royale, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 a Removal of Claims Related to Bankruptcy Cases
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
