Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,038
Poitra v. USA
as 3:2024cv00081
Petitioner: Adam Jason Poitra
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rodney Hurdsman v. Rodney Wright, et al
as 24-1997
Plaintiff: Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Defendant: Viapath Technologies, Inc., formerly known as Globel Tel-Link, Rodney Wright, Sheriff, Saline County, Saline County, Arkansas and others
Wyner v. Dockery et al
as 4:2024cv04037
Plaintiff: Phillip James Wyner
Defendant: Sergeant Dockery, Sergeant Frazier, Lieutenant Guthrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mainieri v. USA
as 4:2024cv00335
Petitioner: Adam Joseph Mainieri
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fredrick Hines v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1970
Plaintiff: Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Defendant: State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Walton v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00396
Plaintiff: DeAndre Walton
Defendant: State of Missouri, Adam A. Field and Gabriel E. Gore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Courtney v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00627
Petitioner: Antonio Courtney
Respondent: Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Criddle v. Jackson County Sheriff Office, et al
as 24-1476
Plaintiff: Michael Christopher Criddle
Defendant: Jackson County Sheriff Office, Ruth Ann Dickerson, David James and others
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff: Keithen L Jones
Defendant: Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Cotten et al
as 4:2024cv04021
Plaintiff: Jerome Edward Washington
Defendant: Prosecuting Attorney David P. Cotten, Jason Mitchell, Warden Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?