Cases 1 - 10 of 442
PEUGH et al v. NADLER et al
as 1:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTA PEUGH and BCC CONCESSIONS, LLC
Defendant:
ADAM J. NADLER and TWISTED TATERS FOOD TRUCK AND MORE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
REAMER v. MITCHELL
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
ADAM REAMER
Defendant:
BRADEN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VAIL v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
SARA VAIL
Defendant:
MARCUS ADAMS and MAG CARRIERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ADAMS v. MEEKS et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
TERRY T. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
JERRICHA MEEKS, STOOPY, DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
MEGAN N. THOMPSON
Defendant:
HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, NICK SMITH, PAUL BICKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAWFEEK v. THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
ADAM A TAWFEEK
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
DIAZ v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
ROLANDO DIAZ
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL, ENGLISH, WADHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAMS v. TYLER et al
as 1:2023cv02187
Plaintiff:
DEMARKUS ADAMS
Defendant:
CHADD TYLER, C. QUARRIER and D. REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2023cv02185
Plaintiff:
DEMARKUS ADAMS
Defendant:
CHRISTINA HARRIS and J. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILCHUCK v. CENTURION OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02184
Plaintiff:
SETH ADAM VILCHUCK
Defendant:
CENTURION OF INDIANA, LISA HAMBLEN, CHARLES HOUCHINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
