Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Yannai v. Department of Justice United States et al
as 4:2018cv40173
Defendant:
Administrative Remedy Coordinator, Central Office, Anthony Amico, Administrative Remedy Coordinator, Northeast Regional Office and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Yannai
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv40057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 16-2149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, Central Office, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE and others
In re: James Roudabush, Jr.
as 16-1860
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Respondent:
E. HALL, Lt., MARCHANELLO, Ltd., LT. BITENER, Lt. and others
Nominal Respondent:
NOEL L. HILLMAN
Darrell Parks v. Andrew Edinger, et al
as 16-1588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW EDINGER, Medical Doctor, KEVIN PIGOS, Medical Director Doctor, FRANCIS FASCIANA, Mid Level Practioner and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN DOE #1 ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, #710756-F1
Stephen Benson v. USA, et al
as 14-4801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE, Chief and Regional Counsel and others
BENSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00213
Petitioner:
STEPHEN J. BENSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR CENTRAL OFFICE, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
