Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Randall v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2015cv00384
Plaintiff:
Charles Randall
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, Ashbel T. Wall, Adult Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dantzler v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2015cv00368
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Dantzler
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island , A. T. Wall and Adult Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jefferson v. Piccirillo, et al
as 15-1825
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD C. JEFFERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PICCIRILLO, Nurse at Rhode Island's Adult COrrectional Institution, DR. BRANSAL, Treating Physician at the Adult Correctional Institution, DR. BLANCHETTE, Treating Physician at the Adult Correctional Institution and others
Suriel v. Wall et al
as 1:2014cv00277
Defendant:
A.T. Wall , Dr. Michael Fine , Department of Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
Engels Suriel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hall v. Adult Correctional Institution
as 1:2013cv00585
Petitioner:
Joseph L. Hall
Respondent:
Adult Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferrell v. Wall
as 13-1267
Petitioner - Appellee:
JASON E. FERRELL
Respondent - Appellant:
A.T. WALL, Warden, of Adult Correctional Institution
Anderson v. ACI
as 1:2012cv00782
Petitioner:
Randy Anderson
Respondent:
Adult Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prout v. ACI
as 1:2012cv00593
Plaintiff:
Justin Prout
Defendant:
Adult Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gautier v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 11-8023
Petitioner:
JACQUES GAUTIER
Respondent:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND and A.T. WALL, Director of the Adult Correctional Institution
Irving v. Weeden et al
as 1:2010cv00346
Plaintiff:
Edward Irving
Defendant:
James Weeden and Adult Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
