Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Alger v. Presgraves et al
as 5:2010cv00035
:
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia, Bo Cook, County of Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jan McRaven v. Sgt. Dan Ansley, et al
as 10-1551
Plaintiff - Appellee: Jan McRaven, guardian of the person and estate of Steven McFarland, an incapacitated person
Defendant: Lt. McMurrian, indivdiually and as a supervisory officer for Garland County, Arkansas, Sgt. Radley, individually and as 7AM - 3PM shift supervisor for the Garland County Detention Center, Deputy Dodge, individually and as an officer of the Garland County Sheriff's Department and others
Defendant - Appellant: Sgt. Dan Ansley, individually and as 3PM - 11PM shift supervisor for the Garland County Detention Center and Nurse Tommy L. Harmon, LPN, indvidually and as nurse for the Garland County Adult Detention Center
Jan McRaven v. Larry Sanders, et al
as 10-1553
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jan McRaven, guardian of the person and estate of Steven McFarland, an incapacitated person
Defendant - Appellee: Larry Sanders, individually and as Sheriff of Garland County, Arkansas and Captain Mel Steed, individually and as jail administrator for adult detention for Garland County, Arkansas
Defendant: Lt. McMurrian, indivdiually and as a supervisory officer for Garland County, Arkansas, Sgt. Radley, individually and as 7AM - 3PM shift supervisor for the Garland County Detention Center, Sgt. Dan Ansley, individually and as 3PM - 11PM shift supervisor for the Garland County Detention Center and others
Phillip David Schaub v. The County of Olmstead, et al
as 10-1371
Plaintiff - Appellant: Phillip David Schaub
Defendant - Appellee: The County of Olmstead, Olmstead County Adult Detention Center, Steven VonWald and others
Phillip David Schaub v. Steven VonWald We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1280
Plaintiff - Appellee: Phillip David Schaub
Defendant: The County of Olmstead, Olmstead County Adult Detention Center, Bernard Sizer and others
Defendant - Appellant: Steven VonWald
Dempsey v. McKinley County et al
as 1:2009cv00536
Plaintiff: Etta Dempsey
Defendant: McKinley County, McKinley County Adult Detention Center, New Mexico Association of Counties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores et al v. United States of America, The et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv00838
Plaintiff: Patricio Flores and Jose Encalada
Defendant: United States of America, The, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the, Scott Baniecke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jan McRaven v. Lt. McMurrian, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-3543
Plaintiff - Appellee: Jan McRaven, guardian of the person and estate of Steven McFarland, an incapacitated person
Defendant: Larry Sanders, individually and as Sheriff of Garland County, Arkansas, Captain Mel Steed, individually and as jail administrator for adult detention for Garland County, Arkansas, Cpl. Forrest L. Marks, individually and as an officer of the Garland County Sheriff's Department and others
Defendant - Appellant: Lt. McMurrian, indivdiually and as a supervisory officer for Garland County, Arkansas, Sgt. Radley, individually and as 7AM - 3PM shift supervisor for the Garland County Detention Center, Sgt. Dan Ansley, individually and as 3PM - 11PM shift supervisor for the Garland County Detention Center and others
Louie Encinias vs. Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center, et al
as 6:2008cv00731
Plaintiff: Louie Encinias
Defendant: Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center, Ron Torres, City of Albuquerque and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hendricks v. Rutherford County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2008cv00648
Plaintiff: Jessie L. Hendricks
Defendant: Rutherford County, Tennessee, Rutherford County Sheriff's Department, Truman L. Jones, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights Both

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?