Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Stephan Bechuck v. Home Depot USA, Incorporated, et al
as 15-20219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHAN BECHUCK
Defendant - Appellee:
HOME DEPOT USA, INCORPORATED and ADVANTAGE SALES & MARKETING, L.L.C., doing business as Advantage CMN, L.L.C.
Borg v. Advantage Sales & Marketing, LLC.
as 3:2015cv01531
Plaintiff:
Debra Borg
Defendant:
Advantage Sales & Marketing, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RTC Industries, Inc. v. Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC
as 1:2014cv09722
Plaintiff:
RTC Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
RAMOS v. EVENTUS MARKETING, LLC. et al
as 1:2014cv24345
Plaintiff:
JANIS RAMOS
Defendant:
EVENTUS MARKETING, LLC. and ADVANTAGE SALES & MARKETING, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bechuck v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv02906
Plaintiff:
Stephan Bechuck
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. , Ambrose G. Witkowski and Sales Managers, Inc. d/b/a Advantage Sales & Marketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC
as 5:2014cv00505
Plaintiff:
Jay Dee Scott
Defendant:
Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC v. Lois Marks
as 8:2013cv01664
Plaintiff:
Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC
Defendant:
Lois Marks
AFM Food Service Corporation v. Advantage Sales & Marketing, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv05695
Plaintiff:
AFM Food Service Corporation
Defendant:
Advantage Sales & Marketing, LLC and Advantage Waypoint, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC v. Promo Works LLC
as 8:2013cv01506
Plaintiff:
Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC
Defendant:
Promo Works LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
