Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Cabeza Robles v. Wait Pesterfield
as 1:2024cv00518
Plaintiff: Augustine E. Cabeza Robles and Agustin E. Cabeza Robles
Defendant: Wait Pesterfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Maria Felipe-Agustin v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2202
Petitioner: MARIA FELIPE-AGUSTIN and M.D.G.F.
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Agustin Villagrana-Fernandez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2184
Petitioner: AGUSTIN VILLAGRANA-FERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Agustin Gomez-Rojas
as 23-6229
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: AGUSTIN GOMEZ-ROJAS
Gomez-Rojas v. USA
as 5:2022cv00365
Petitioner: Agustin Gomez-Rojas
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mondragon v. Warden Wolfe
as 5:2022cv00216
Petitioner: Agustin Mondragon
Respondent: Warden Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinez-Morales et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00187
Plaintiff: Jose Cruz Martinez-Morales, Margarito De La Cruz-Nava, Cuauhtemoc Florencio-Gutierrez and others
Defendant: Valentino Lopez, Jr., Gilberto Lopez, Hannah Forrest Farms, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gouge v. Jear Logistics, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00040
Plaintiff: Danny Gouge
Defendant: Jear Logistics, LLC, Anyway Logistics, Inc., Austin A. Loza, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jose Carrillo-Agustin v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2376
Petitioner: JOSE LUIS CARRILLO-AGUSTIN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Agustin Gomez-Rojas
as 21-4580
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: AGUSTIN GOMEZ-ROJAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?