Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Mohammed v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04073
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammed
Defendant:
99 Cents Only Stores LLC and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mohamed v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
as 8:2016cv00504
Plaintiff:
Ehab Ahmed Mohamed
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hayward et al v. Taylor Truck Line, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00866
Plaintiff:
Craig Hayward and Donna Hayward
Defendant:
Taylor Truck Line, Inc. and Ahmed Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Terrorist Attacks on Se
as 12-1441
Plaintiff:
Emily Motroni, as Administrator of the estate of Marco Motroni, deceased and on behalf of all survivors of Marco Motroni, Hiscox Dedicated Corporate Member, Ltd., Andy Dinoo, as co-Administrator of the Estate of Rena Sam-Dinnoo ,deceased and on behalf of all survivors of Rena Sam-Dinnoo and others
Defendant:
Islamic Investment Company of the Gulf (Sharjah), Saleh Abdullah Kamel, Rahman Abdul Siral-Khatim, Minister of Defense and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cantor Fitzgerald Brokerage, L.P., Cantor Fitzgerald Associates, L.P., Cantor Index Limited and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
MOHAMED et al v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv02186
Plaintiff:
MARILYN MOHAMED and AHMED MOHAMED
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mohamed v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv11761
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Mohammad et al v. Airbus, S.A.S. et al
as 1:2009cv01817
Plaintiff:
Al Gasim Obied Ibrahim Mohammad, Fadulallah Eltahir Fadulallah, Sulaf Dafaalah Abdelaziz and others
Defendant:
Airbus, S.A.S., Airbus Americas, United Technologies Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
