Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01128
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Haj v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00733
Petitioner: Khaled Al Haj
Respondent: United States of America and R. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Al-haj v. Chres et al
as 6:2023cv06184
Plaintiff: Nagibe Al-haj
Defendant: SHTA Chres, SHTA Janis, SHTA Duanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-haj v. Rochester Psychiatric Center
as 6:2022cv06533
Plaintiff: Nagibe Al-hai and Nagibe Al-haj
Defendant: Rochester Psychiatric Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-haj v. Shelby et al
as 6:2022cv06377
Plaintiff: Nagibe Al-haj
Defendant: T.T.L Shelby, R.P. Center, SHTA Janice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CHOWDHURY v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH et al
as 1:2022cv02033
Plaintiff: EBRAHIM CHOWDHURY and ENAMUL HAQE CHOWDHURY
Defendant: MUHAMMAD MASUDUL HAQUE, MUHAMMAD FARUQE TALUKDER SOHEL, AL-HAJ MUHAMMAD NASHIR UDDING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Khaled Al HajIn re: Khaled Al Haj
as 22-10606
Petitioner: In re: Khaled Al Haj
CHOWDHURY v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH et al
as 1:2022cv01541
Plaintiff: ENAMUL HAQE CHOWDHURY
Defendant: MUHAMMAD MASUDUL HAQUE, MUHAMMAD FARUQE TALUKDER SOHEL, AL-HAJ MUHAMMAD NASHIR UDDING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Al Haj
as 21-10293
Defendant / Appellant: Khaled Al Haj
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
USA v. Al Haj We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-10036
Defendant / Appellant: Khaled Al Haj
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?