Cases 21 - 30 of 371
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12439
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Llovera v. Alabama, State of
as 5:2023cv00944
Petitioner:
Rafael Llovera
Respondent:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Alabama, State of et al
as 6:2023cv00953
Petitioner:
William Smith
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casey v. Alabama, State of et al
as 6:2023cv00950
Petitioner:
Brian D Casey, Sr
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DeJesus v. Alabama, State of et al
as 6:2023cv00952
Petitioner:
Steven DeJesus
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Conor v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2023cv00819
Petitioner:
Wesley Dewayne Conor
Respondent:
Alabama, State of, Karen Williams and Hon. Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oates v. Alabama, State of et al
as 6:2023cv00951
Petitioner:
Noah J Oates
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
In Re: Subpoena issued to Navitas Credit Corp.
as 1:2023mi00061
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank as successor by merger to Ascentium Capital LLC, an Alabama state-chartered bank doing business as Ascentium Capital LLC
Petitioner:
Navitas Credit Corp.
Gould v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2023cv00860
Petitioner:
Roland Andra Gould
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hal Marshall
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Calhoun County and Bud Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
