Cases 51 - 60 of 418
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Holmes v. Alabama, State of
as 5:2022cv00922
Plaintiff:
Henry James Holmes, III
Defendant:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitworth v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00881
Petitioner:
Ronald Loyd Whitworth, Jr
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antonio Oscar Tatum v. Montgomery County, et al
as 22-12137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO TATUM
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Staggers v. Alabama, State of
as 5:2022cv00795
Petitioner:
Gary Staggers
Respondent:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2022cv00248
Petitioner:
Ronnie Lee Brown
Respondent:
Alabama State of and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hulbert v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2022cv00729
Plaintiff:
Adam Hulbert
Defendant:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Traywick v. Alabama, State of
as 3:2022cv00700
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S Traywick
Defendant:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Alabama, State of
as 4:2022cv00572
Petitioner:
Brian Lindsey
Respondent:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
