Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Neal v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Chester L. Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilkerson v. Cohen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Cardarius Wilkerson
Defendant:
Alan Cohen, FPC Montgomery and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mahbubani v. Cohen (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Rajesh Mahbubani
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mays v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Chapman Rogers Mays
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Irwin v. Cohen et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irwin
Defendant:
Alan Cohen and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Joseph v. Cohen et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Ludrick Joseph
Defendant:
Alan Cohen, Steven T. Marshall and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanchez v. Cohen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Sanchez
Defendant:
Alan Cohen, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lapp v. Cohen et al
as 1:2022cv00949
Plaintiff:
Katie F. Lapp
Defendant:
David Alan Cohen, Trudy Mintz, Brian Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Casper v. Cohen (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Craven Casper
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alvarez v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00826
Plaintiff:
Elias Gonzalez Alvarez
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
