Cases 1 - 10 of 21
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10164
Plaintiff:
JACOB ALAN HILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Hill v. Leikauf et al
as 2:2023cv01593
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill and Michael Alan Hill
Defendant:
Jeff Leikauf, El Dorado County Sheriff Jail-SLT, Well Path Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. PITTSBURGH POLICE et al
as 2:2023cv01203
Plaintiff:
CURTIS CAMPBELL
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH POLICE, OFFICER PERRY ALAN HILLS, JR., OFFICER ANTONACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25127
Plaintiff:
CHAD ALAN HILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03371
Plaintiff:
ALAN HILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCAPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35872
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN HILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Robertson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00443
Defendant:
Andrew Hall and Robertson County, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
Alan Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24904
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ALAN HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv11968
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALAN HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05160
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
