Cases 1 - 10 of 14
LOCKE v. CANADY et al
as 4:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Wendell Locke and WENDELL TERRY LOCKE
Defendant:
CHARLES CANADY, RICKY POLSTON, JORGE LABARGA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
LAWSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63972
Plaintiff:
ALAN LAWSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TURNER v. CANADY et al
as 4:2021cv00163
Defendant:
JOSHUA E DOYLE, FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, ALAN LAWSON and others
Plaintiff:
MADISON B TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD v. LONG et al
as 4:2021cv00109
Defendant:
M KEMMERLY THOMAS, ALAN LAWSON, ROSS L BILBREY and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JOSEPH ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv04050
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALAN LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHESTNUT v. CANADY et al
as 4:2019cv00271
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT
Defendant:
JOHN TOMASINO, CLERK FLORIDA SUPREME COURT, CHARLES CANADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Lawson et al
as 2:2019cv14060
Defendant:
S. Milliken, Alberto Gonzales, Alan Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Micheal Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Lawson et al
as 2:2019cv14033
Defendant:
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Justice Alan Lawson, Lynretta Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Michael Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEAVER v. GLICK et al
as 4:2018cv00572
Defendant:
LESLIE B ROTHENBERG, IVAN F FERNANDEZ, EDWIN A SCALES and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL THOMAS WEAVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Barkdull et al
as 9:2018cv80143
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Taylor
Defendant:
Thomas H. Barkdull, III, Jonathan D Gerber, Martha C. Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
