Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Miller v. Lake County Montana
as 9:2023cv00058
Petitioner:
Boe Alan Miller
Respondent:
Lake County Montana, James Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Strucker et al
as 6:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Boe Alan Miller
Respondent:
Melissa Strucker and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Boe Alan Miller
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, State of Montana, Lake County District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. USA
as 3:2020cv00376
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brett Alan Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Miller v. Inch
as 9:2019cv81565
Defendant:
Mark S. Inch
Plaintiff:
Patrick Alan Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv03178
Defendant:
. Bouvet, Colin Bruce, Billy Johnston and others
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Lee et al
as 3:2018cv00225
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Hubbard
Defendant:
Tasha Benee Lee, Gregory Alan Miller and Michelle Fenness Kraus
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2015cv00548
Plaintiff:
BRAD ALAN MILLER
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS and WALTON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin Alan Miller v. State of Minnesota
as 11-3800
Petitioner - Appellant:
Franklin Alan Miller
Respondent - Appellee:
State of Minnesota
Miller, Jr v. Black Hawk County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2011cv02054
Plaintiff:
Stephen Alan Miller, Jr
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Sheriff's Office and Any and all unnamed persons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
