Cases 61 - 70 of 322
Goss v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2021cv00900
Defendant:
Julie J Armstrong and Alan Wilson
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et al v. Wilson et al
as 3:2021cv00508
Defendant:
Theresa Mills-Floyd, Anne G. Cook, Richard Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Buffkin, Planned Parenthood South Atlantic and Greenville Women's Clinic
Intervenor:
James H. Lucas, Jay and Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Foster v. McMaster et al
as 9:2021cv00387
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Foster
Defendant:
Bryant Sterling, Gov Henry McMaster, Alan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Foster v. Larry Powell
as 21-6279
Defendant / Appellee:
SPARTANBURG CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, TONY FISHER, Director, J. L. HALL, Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE FOSTER
Graham v. State of South Carolina et al
as 6:2021cv00769
Defendant:
Florence County Court Systems, State of South Carolina and Alan Wilson
Plaintiff:
Robert Graham, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sigmon v. Stirling et al
as 3:2021cv00278
Plaintiff:
Brad Sigmon
Defendant:
Alan Wilson, South Carolina Department of Corrections and Bryan Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Norris v. McMaster et al
as 8:2020cv04295
Plaintiff:
Carnie Norris, III
Defendant:
Alan Wilson, Bryant Stirling and Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Wilson
as 2:2021cv00155
Defendant:
Alan Wilson
Plaintiff:
Darrell Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice 360 v. Stirling et al
as 3:2020cv03671
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Alan Wilson and Bryan P. Stirling
Plaintiff:
Justice 360
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Stirling et al
as 3:2020cv04084
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Alan Wilson and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Richard Bernard Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
