Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Loyalty Conversion Systems Corporation v. Alaska Air Group, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00657
Plaintiff:
Loyalty Conversion Systems Corporation
Defendant:
Alaska Air Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Interface IP Holdings LLC v. Alaska Air Group Inc.
as 1:2013cv00373
Plaintiff:
Interface IP Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Alaska Air Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
TQP Development, LLC v. Alaska Air Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03065
Plaintiff:
TQP Development, LLC
Defendant:
Alaska Air Group, Inc. and U.S. Airways, Inc.
Movant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
TQP Development, LLC v. Alaska Air Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012mi00134
Plaintiff:
TQP Development, LLC
Defendant:
Alaska Air Group, Inc. and U.S. Airways, Inc.
Movant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Sandra Espinoza, et al v. Alaska Air Group, Inc., et al
as 12-55801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDRA ESPINOZA
Plaintiff:
DAVID PERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. and ALASKA AIRLINES
Aeritas LLC v. Alaska Air Group Inc.
as 1:2011cv00967
Plaintiff:
Aeritas LLC
Defendant:
Alaska Air Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Rome v. Transportation Security Administration et al
as 2:2011cv00055
Plaintiff:
Patricia Rome
Defendant:
Transportation Security Administration, John Pistole, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TQP Development, LLC v. Alaska Air Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00398
Plaintiff:
TQP Development, LLC
Defendant:
Alaska Air Group, Inc., Alaska Airlines, Inc., British Airways, PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Brown v. Alaska Air Group Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jennie Marie Strike Brown
Defendant:
Alaska Air Group Inc , Alaska Airlines Inc and Horizon Air Industries, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sandra Espinoza et al v. Alaska Air Group Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01271
Defendant:
Alaska Air Group Inc, Alaska Airlines and Does
Plaintiff:
Sandra Espinoza and David Perry
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
