Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Shaykh Muhammad Al Saud v. Albert Trevino, et al
as 21-16088
Defendant / Appellee:
RIDENOUR, Sergeant, C. SIERA, Position Guard at Arizona State Prison Florence-Eyman SMU-1, RICARDO MONTES, Security Captain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAYKH MUHAMMAD ABDUL BIN TALAL AL SAUD, AKA Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud
Shaykh Muhammad Al Saud v. Albert Trevino, et al
as 20-16113
Defendant / Appellee:
RICARDO MONTES, Security Captain, DAVID SHINN, Director, RIDENOUR, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAYKH MUHAMMAD ABDUL BIN TALAL AL SAUD
Alsaud v. Trevino et al
as 2:2020cv00022
Defendant:
Ricardo Montes, David Shinn, Albert Trevino and others
Plaintiff:
Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 1:2018cv00146
Plaintiff:
Albert Trevino
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York, Trustee for the Benefit of the Certificate Holders of the CWABS, Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates Trust, Series 2005-17 and The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrillo v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2017cv00129
Petitioner:
Albert Trevino Carrillo
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Albert Carrillo v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10153
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALBERT TREVINO CARRILLO
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Carrillo v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2014cv01749
Petitioner:
Albert Trevino Carrillo
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lauzon et al v. Pulte Homes, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00177
Plaintiff:
Joyce Arreche, Juan Arreche, Edward Del Rio and others
Defendant:
Centex Homes, Inc., Pulte Homes of Texas, L.P. and Pulte Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
