Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Castillo, Jr. v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2026cv00541
Plaintiff:
Alberto Castillo, Jr.
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation doing business as PHH Mortgage Services
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01020
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Batioje v. Warden Childress
as 3:2025cv00904
Plaintiff:
Alberto Castillo-Batioje
Defendant:
Warden Childress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bit O Home MHP v. City of Santa Ana et al
as 8:2025cv02406
Defendant:
City of Santa Ana, The City of Santa Ana Rent Stabilization Division, CITY OF SANTA ANA RENTAL HOUSING BOARD and others
Plaintiff:
Bit O Home MHP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
In re: Alberto Castillo
as 25-2595
Petitioner:
In re: ALBERTO CASTILLO
Respondent:
LEHIGH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE
United States of America v. Padilla Santos
as 25-2011
Defendant:
JUAN CARLOS PADILLA SANTOS, Juan Alberto Castillo, Juan Santos and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Oscar Vasquez v. Pamela Bondi
as 25-1462
Petitioner:
OSCAR ANTONI VASQUEZ, a/k/a Jose Alberto Castillo Vasquez
Respondent:
PAMELA JO BONDI, Attorney General
ESPINOZA ESCALONA et al v. NOEM et al
as 1:2025cv00604
Plaintiff:
MAIKER ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA ESCALONA, JACKSON MANUEL VILLA WILHELM, JORGE ALBERTO CASTILLO CERRANO and others
Defendant:
KRISTI NOEM, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MADISON SHEAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
