Cases 1 - 10 of 251
Calkin v. Wexford, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Calkin
Defendant:
SGT. Kristie Piskor, SGT. Anthony Vermeulen, CO Janice Vanhaltsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Nichols #734845 v. Perry et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Danny Albert Nichols #734845
Defendant:
Unknown Perry, Unknown Balldini and Unknown Neeble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 2:2024mc50259
Defendant:
STRATFS, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Keith Ellison and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Letitia James, People of the State of New York and others
Nichols v. Davis
as 2:2024cv10543
Petitioner:
Danny Albert Nichols, Jr
Respondent:
Michigan, State of and John Davis
Nichols v. Perry et al
as 2:2024cv10542
Plaintiff:
Danny Albert Nichols, Jr
Defendant:
Perry, Balldini and Neeble
Ross v. Kent County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Terrell Ross
Defendant:
Kent County Sheriff's Department, Grand Rapids, City of, Grand Rapids Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Romeo v. Albert et al
as 2:2024cv10378
Plaintiff:
Francis Romeo
Defendant:
Julie Albert, Virginia Godell and Julie Wojtylko
Sarles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Albert Sarles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Robinson #602273 v. Hitchingham et al
as 1:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Albert Reginald Robinson #602273
Defendant:
Unknown Hitchingham, Unknown Silliman, Unknown Kissell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Hitchingham et al
as 2:2024cv10067
Plaintiff:
Albert R. Robinson
Defendant:
Hitchingham, Silliman, Kissell and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
