Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Alcaraz v. Helton et al
as 2:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Adrianna Alcaraz
Defendant:
Viviana Helton and Monty Helton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alcaraz v. Helton et al
as 2:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Adrianna Alcaraz
Defendant:
Viviana Helton and Monty Helton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Cahill et al
as 5:2022cv03305
Plaintiff:
Richard Leroy Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Cahill, Tonda Hill, Candice Alcaraz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Estate of Amy Lynn Cross et al v. Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03143
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Bauder and Lisa McMullen
Defendant:
Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC, Turn Key Health Clinicians, PLLC, Turn Key Health Clinics Colorado, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores-Alcaraz v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv00895
Plaintiff:
David Flores-Alcaraz
Defendant:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States v. Alcaraz
as 11-2185
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
IGNACIO ALCARAZ
Herrejon-Alcaraz et al v. PHO Green Papaya et al
as 1:2010cv00060
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Osiris Herrejon-Alcaraz and Angel Hernandez
Defendant:
PHO Green Papaya, Sapa, Nguyen Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Alcaraz v. Applebee's
as 1:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
Martin Alcaraz
Defendant:
Applebee's and Lynn Pedro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
