Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Hernandez et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Justin A. Hernandez, Carlos Mondragon, Javier Sanchez and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TMSSS Enterprise LLC et al v. Tooma et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
TMSSS Enterprise LLC and Alejandro Medina
Defendant:
James Tooma, Chaldean Properties Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Medina Lugo v. Ramirez Padilla
as 6:2023cv00232
Petitioner:
Danhoe Alejandro Medina Lugo
Respondent:
Maria Milagros Ramirez Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
MEDINA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
OMAR ALEJANDRO MEDINA
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MEDINA v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
OMAR ALEJANDRO MEDINA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MEDINA v. BONTA
as 1:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
OMAR ALEJANDRO MEDINA
Defendant:
ROB BONTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
USA v. Medina-Rios
as 21-50725
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alejandro Medina-Rios, also known as Alejandro Rodriguez-Villa
USA v. Medina-Rios
as 21-50728
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alejandro Medina-Rios
Valentin Diaz et al v. 4 A Kids, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv09058
Plaintiff:
Leonel Valentin Diaz, Oliverkin Matos Ortiz, Jesus Fernandez and others
Defendant:
Hutch Metro Cafe Corp., Anthony Bastone, 4 A Kids, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
QUALITY LEASING CO., INC. v. FACTSA LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02695
Plaintiff:
QUALITY LEASING CO., INC.
Defendant:
FACTSA LLC, CARLOS BARRERA and ALEJANDRO MEDINA DE LA CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
