Cases 41 - 50 of 77
State of Oregon, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-35386
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, PLANNED PARENTHOOD COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DIANE FOLEY, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, AND SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE and others
State of Washington, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-35394
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION, STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEBORAH OYER, M.D. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DIANE FOLEY, MD, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF OHIO, AND 12 OTHER STATES, SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST and AMERICANS UNITED FOR LIFE
City and County of San Francisco v. Azar II et al
as 3:2019cv02405
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco
Defendant:
Roger Severino, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar II and others
Petitioner:
State of California, by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra
Interested Party:
County of Santa Clara
Amicus Curiae:
Service Employees International Union, Local 1021, Institute for Policy Integrity, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Sunsites-Pearce Fire District v. Azar et al
as 4:2019cv00203
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M Azar, II, Seema Verma and others
Plaintiff:
Sunsites-Pearce Fire District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
All Home Medical Supply, Inc. v. Azar, II
as 3:2019cv00496
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II
Plaintiff:
All Home Medical Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association et al v. Azar II et al
as 1:2019cv03045
Plaintiff:
Deborah Oyer, National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association, Teresa Gall and others
Defendant:
Alex M Azar II, Diane Foley, Office of Population Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association et al v. Azar II et al
as 4:2019cv05035
Plaintiff:
Deborah Oyer, National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association, Teresa Gall and others
Defendant:
Alex M Azar II, Diane Foley, Office of Population Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Washington v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv03040
Plaintiff:
State of Washington, Deborah Oyer, National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M Azar, II, Diane Foley and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Physicians, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, State of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
American Medical Association et al v. Azar et al
as 6:2019cv00318
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, United States Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Population Affairs and others
Plaintiff:
American Medical Association, Michele P. Megregian, C.N.M., Thomas N. Ewing, M.D. and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Oregon et al v. State of Illinois et al
as 6:2019cv00316
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
