Cases 71 - 80 of 264
ALEXANDER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00291
Petitioner:
NIJUL QUADIR ALEXANDER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Pearson, E Lowe, Croft and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TESTANI v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv01697
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER TESTANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLS v. WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 4:2021cv00088
Defendant:
BRENT MILLER, INDIANA STATE POLICE, WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB MILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROMASHKO v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv01283
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROMASHKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pratt v. LaPorte County of et al
as 3:2021cv00360
Plaintiff:
Robert Omar Pratt, Jr and Rev. Robert Pratt, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Hagler, Holt, Allen W Ott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRESSLEY et al v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00202
Plaintiff:
NIJUL ALEXANDER, JAMES R. PRESSLEY, AMIN RICKER and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and T. J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Reillo et al
as 2:2021cv00142
Defendant:
P.O. Alexander Reillo, City of Munster, Alexander Reillo and others
Plaintiff:
Damonte Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MCGHEE v. ALEXANDER et al
as 1:2021cv00687
Plaintiff:
JASMINE MCGHEE
Defendant:
MICAH ALEXANDER and ROEHL TRANSPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
