Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United States of America v. Wathogoma
as 24-311
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXANDER DAVID WATHOGOMA
HUBER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11398
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DAVID HUBER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14792
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DAVID DEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brock v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01406
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander David Brock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv14834
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DAVID DEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander David v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2020cv01685
Plaintiff:
Alexander David
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vickers v. Roehl Transport, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00143
Plaintiff:
Richard Vickers
Defendant:
Roehl Transport, Inc. and Alexander David Hahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BYRD et al v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv15406
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DAVID and TERESA BYRD
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., PFIZER INC. and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander David Arndt v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2018cv10699
Defendant:
Victor Ekanem, Andrea Lefebvre, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander D Arndt and Alexander David Arndt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
David v. United Natural Foods West, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01436
Plaintiff:
Alexander David
Defendant:
United Natural Foods West, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
