Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Vasquez v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Alexander Vasquez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Nelson Vasquez-Cruz v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1913
Petitioner:
NELSON ALEXANDER VASQUEZ-CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Stone #1 et al v. Annucci et al
as 1:2020cv01326
Plaintiff:
Jane Stone #4, Jane Stone #3, Jane Stone #2 and others
Defendant:
Tanya Mitchell-Voyd, Jason Effman, Matthew Antolini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Alexander Vasquez v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2019cv01473
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
John Alexander Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
VASQUEZ v. GRUNLEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. et al
as 1:2015cv02106
Defendant:
GRUNLEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. , C.R. CALDERON CONSTRUCTION, INC. and GARFIAS DRYWALL & FINISH, LLC
Plaintiff:
LUIS ALEXANDER VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
GUARDADO et al v. FATHI & ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00538
Plaintiff:
VICTOR RENE GUARDADO , HECTOR ALEXANDER VASQUEZ , CESAR RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant:
FATHI & ASSOCIATES, INC., NC FIREHOUSE, LLC, 1251 4TH STREET, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
United State Of America v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2013cv02459
Plaintiff:
United State Of America
Defendant:
Alexander Vasquez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Ludwin Vasquez-Mejia v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-74021
Petitioner:
LUDWIN ALEXANDER VASQUEZ-MEJIA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
William Vasquez-Ramos v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-72194
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ALEXANDER VASQUEZ-RAMOS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
