Cases 11 - 20 of 23
USA v. Danny Bucio-Cabrale
as 14-3991
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANNY BUCIO-CABRALES, aka Alfredo Diaz
Couch et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as MOE/4:14-cv-00955
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Milton Couch , Alfredo Diaz , Marcella Buter and others
Couch et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00955
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Milton Couch , Alfredo Diaz , Marcella Buter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diaz et al v. BE Fresh, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00392
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Diaz , Jorge Tamayo , Jose Luis Rey and others
Defendant:
BE Fresh, Inc., Neil Seth, Subash Seth and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Diaz-Gomez et al v. Capitol Farmer's Market, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01038
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Diaz-Gomez , Yoni Santizo-Lopez , Pablo Lopez-Luna and others
Defendant:
Capitol Farmer's Market, Inc. and Yeun S. Yim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207
Diaz v. Pluckers - Austin #3, LP, et al
as 1:2010cv00293
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Diaz
Defendant:
Mark Greenburg, Sean Greenburg, Pluckers - Austin #3, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Hugo Diaz, Jr., et al
as 09-40946
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HUGO ALBERTO DIAZ, JR. and HUGO ALFREDO DIAZ, also known as Hugo Alfredo Diaz, Sr.
Martinez et al v. Southeast Mechanical Contractors, LLC et al
as 0:2009cv61280
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Diaz Martinez, Geordany Flores, Julio R. Abalo and others
Defendant:
Southeast Mechanical Contractors, LLC and Joseph Manteiga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
