Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Romero Lopez v. Garland
as 23-3863
Petitioner:
JOSE ALFREDO ROMERO LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Luis Roberto Gonzalez Macias v. William Barr
as 20-70738
Petitioner:
LUIS ROBERTO GONZALEZ MACIAS, AKA Luis Roberto Gonzales Macias, Francisco Alfredo Romero
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
USA v. Alfredo Romero-Chavez
as 18-10290
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALFREDO ROMERO-CHAVEZ, AKA Alfredo R. Chavez, AKA Alfredo Romero Chavez, AKA Alfredo Chavez-Romero
Alfredo Romero v. Rissie Owens, et al
as 16-50469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFREDO ROMERO
Defendant - Appellee:
RISSIE OWENS, Chairman of Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles, FRED SOLIS, Board Member, San Antonio Parole Region, ANTHONY RAMIREZ, Commissioner, San Antonio Parole Region and others
USA v. Alfredo Romero Gonzalez
as 16-50198
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALFREDO ROMERO GONZALEZ, also known as Alfredo Gonzalez, also known as Alfredo R. Gonzalez, also known as Fred Gonzalez
Romero v. Carpenter
as 4:2015cv03017
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Romero
Defendant:
Clint Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Carpenter
as 5:2015cv00874
Defendant:
Clint Carpenter
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Owens
as 5:2015cv00868
Defendant:
Rissie Owens, Anthony Ramirez, Fred Solis and others
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2015cv01265
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Romero and Norma Sanchez-Romero
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Chase Home Finance, LLC and Liberty Mutual Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GONZALEZ v. KNOX et al
as 3:2011cv00089
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO ROMERO GONZALEZ
Defendant:
FNU Knox and FNU Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
