Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Wade v. Chao et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017mc80085
Plaintiff: E. K. Wade
Defendant: Elaine Chao, Woody Gilliland, Doug Betten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Chao et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00004
Plaintiff: E. K. Wade
Defendant: Elaine Chao, Woody Gilliland, Doug Betten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Barclays Bank Delaware
as 8:2016cv01502
Plaintiff: Alice Young
Defendant: Barclays Bank Delaware
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Young v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv10361
Plaintiff: Alice Young
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clavesilla et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv32920
Plaintiff: Amber Clavesilla , Martha Martin , Jo Strauch and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amber Clavesilla et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as CAC/2:13-cv-06284
Plaintiff: Amber Clavesilla , Martha Martin , Jo Strauch and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon Inc , Ethicon LLC and others
Amber Clavesilla et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv06284
Plaintiff: Robin Anderson, Christy L Appleby, Christina Armentrout and others
Defendant: Does, Ethicon Inc, Ethicon LLC and others
Young v. Aleem et al
as 1:2013cv00224
Plaintiff: Alice Young
Defendant: Asaf Aleem, Joel Axler and Peachford Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Chapman v. United States [central] government
as 0:2011cv61969
Plaintiff: Christopher Chapman and Roanne Eye
Defendant: United States [central] government, Federico A. Moreno, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
E. Wade v. Woody Gilliland, et al
as 10-16600
Plaintiff - Appellant: E. K. WADE
Defendant - Appellee: WOODY GILLILAND, WILLIAM SMITHERMAN, GEORGE MARTIN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?