Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Cheryl Miller v. Apollo Endosurgery US, Inc., et al
as 19-2501
Defendant / Appellee:
Allergan Inc., Apollo Endosurgery US, Inc. and Allergan Sales, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cheryl Miller
Miller v. Apollo Endosurgery US Inc et al
as 1:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Allergan Inc, Allergan Sales LLC and Apollo Endosurgery US Inc
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Green et al v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00796
Plaintiff:
Christine Green and Jordan Pitler
Defendant:
Alcon Laboratories, Inc. , Alcon Research, Ltd. , Allergan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sumpter et al v. Allergan, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv02289
Plaintiff:
Robin M. Sumpter and John Sumpter
Defendant:
Allergan, Inc. , Nusil Technology LLC and Carol R. Mischnick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warner Chilcott Limited et al v. Express Scripts, Inc. et al.
as 4:2017mc00250
Petitioner:
Warner Chilcott Limited , Warner Chilcott Company, LLC , Warner Chilcott (US), LLC and others
Respondent:
Express Scripts, Inc. and Express Scripts Holding Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Thompson v. Allergan USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
Fancine Thompson
Defendant:
Allergan USA, Inc. , Allergan, Inc. and Allergan Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crouse, et al v. Grado, et al
as 1:2012cv00054
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Crouse and Randy Crouse
Defendant:
Charles E Grado, Richard J Kozeny, Plastic Surgical Center PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Brist v. Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv01627
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Brist, Rebecca Brist and Rebecca Brist
Defendant:
Advanced Medical Optics, Inc., Advanced Medical Optics, Inc., Allergan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Torts - Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
