Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hebert v. Allied Rubber & Gasket Co.
as 23-1511
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LELAND J. HEBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLIED RUBBER & GASKET CO.
Victaulic Company v. Allied Rubber & Gasket Co., Inc.
as 3:2022cv01366
Plaintiff:
Victaulic Company
Defendant:
Allied Rubber & Gasket Co., Inc. doing business as ARGCO, a California Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Hebert v. Allied Rubber & Gasket Co., Inc.
as 3:2020cv01350
Plaintiff:
Leland J. Hebert
Defendant:
Allied Rubber & Gasket Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Victaulic Company v. Allied Rubber & Gasket Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01006
Plaintiff:
Victaulic Company
Defendant:
Allied Rubber & Gasket Co., Inc. and Taizhou Realflex Pipetec Co., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Thompson et al v. A. O. Smith Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv01798
Plaintiff:
Corley E. Thompson and Ellen Thompson
Defendant:
A. O. Smith Corporation, A. O. Smith Water Products, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Little et al v A. O. Smith Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv01800
Plaintiff:
Patricia D. Little and Kenneth P. Little
Defendant:
A. O. Smith Corporation, A. O. Smith Water Products, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POGGIOLI et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv80099
Plaintiff:
THERESA C. POGGIOLI, MARTHA C. SPALDING, DORIS STALLARD and others
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AGL WELDING SUPPLY CO., INC., ALFA LAVAL,INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
POGGIOLI et al v. A.J. FRIEDMAN SUPPY CO., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00504
Plaintiff:
THERESA C. POGGIOLI, MARTHA C. SPALDING and DORIS STALLARD
Defendant:
A.J. FRIEDMAN SUPPY CO., INC., A.J. MCNEIL CO.,INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
