Cases 61 - 70 of 180
Allred v. Carr et al
as 4:2020cv00897
Defendant:
Warden Carr, Mrs. Cole-Rowls, Officer Friese and others
Plaintiff:
Carrie Allred
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Carr
as 4:2020cv00807
Plaintiff:
Genesis Gonzalez, Tanya Torrence, Tiffany Snodgrass and others
Defendant:
Warden Carr, Mrs. Cole-Rowls, Lt. Anothny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wigley v. James V Allred Unit et al
as 7:2020cv00070
Defendant:
James V Allred Unit, James Smith, E Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Troy E Wigley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allred et al v. Accord Healthcare, Inc.
as 2:2020cv01000
Plaintiff:
Tammy Allred and Harvey Wayne Allred
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tammy et al v. Accord Healthcare, Inc.
as 2:2020xc00999
Plaintiff:
Tammy Allred and Harvey Wayne Allred
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lockwood v. Warden, Allred Unit
as 4:2020cv00973
Plaintiff:
Robert D Lockwood and Cecil Brown
Defendant:
Warden, Allred Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Lawson, et al v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 20-10099
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN, Custodian of Offender Records, JAMES P. ANDERS, Assistant Warden at the James V. Allred Unit, MAILROOM SYSTEM COORDINATOR'S PANEL, Director, individually and in their official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL EUGENE LAWSON
Appellant:
RANDALL SCOTT JORDAN
Medford v. Allred Unit
as 7:2020cv00010
Plaintiff:
Mike Medford
Defendant:
Allred Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Allred Unit
as 7:2019cv00134
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Brooks
Defendant:
Allred Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hassell v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00967
Plaintiff:
Melvin R. Hassell
Defendant:
Louise P Hytken, Ramonna Nottinger, Phil Umphress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
