Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00347
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bruno Riebeiro De Almeida v. Attorney General United States
as 20-3531
Petitioner:
BRUNO RIEBEIRO DE ALMEIDA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MAZAHREH et al v. GREWAL et al
as 1:2020cv17598
Defendant:
MARK P. TARANTINO, THOMAS BRYAN, GURBIR GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY RIFLE & PISTOL CLUBS, INC., BILLY NUNES DE ALMEIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHEUFLER v. STEFANSKI et al
as 2:2020cv06141
Defendant:
ELIZABETH II, GRUBIR S GREWAL, STEVEN T. MNUCHIN and others
Plaintiff:
KARL PETER SCHEUFLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALMEIDA v. URSA MAJOR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv01320
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALMEIDA
Defendant:
URSA MAJOR CORPORATION and KEVIN J. EICHHORN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESPINOZA v. TOP CAR AUTO BODY, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01499
Defendant:
TOP CAR AUTO BODY, INC., ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ and ANTONIO ALMEIDA
Plaintiff:
HUGO EDGARDO ESPINOZA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01871
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
ALMEIDA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2019cv17495
Plaintiff:
DOLORES ALMEIDA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
ALMEIDA v. SBA NETWORK SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv08908
Defendant:
TIMOTHY M DONALDSON, ABC CO. 1-10, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
ELESSANDRO D ALMEIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARRISON v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2018cv16358
Defendant:
RAFAEL R CASTRO, JONATHAN LOPUSKI, JEFFREY ALMEIDA and others
Plaintiff:
KRYA HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
