Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Siefert et al v. Hamilton County/ Hamilton County Board of Commissioners/ Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services et al
as 1:2017cv00511
Plaintiff:
Joseph Siefert and Melissa Siefert
Defendant:
Hamilton County/ Hamilton County Board of Commissioners/ Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services , Moira Weir , Eric Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
ALMEIDA et al v. CONFORTI et al
as 2:2016cv03411
Defendant:
CONFORTI, ROBERT LOUGY, MICHAEL S RICHARDS and others
Plaintiff:
ALMEIDA, ISRAEL ALBERT ALMEIDA and MICHAEL R TUMMINELLI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrido v. Stein et al
as 1:2016cv01314
Plaintiff:
Primavera Garrido
Defendant:
Beatriz Almeida Stein and Martin Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv24481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Almeida v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv03447
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Almeida
Defendant:
City of New York , New York City Department Of Corrections, Balukas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almeida v. Mega Million
as 4:2015cv00800
Plaintiff:
Boniek Alves Almeida
Defendant:
Mega Million
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muniz v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Angel Muniz
Defendant:
The City of New York, Almeida, Natalia Taveras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foudy et al v. Rice et al
as 1:2014cv23009
Plaintiff:
Toni Foudy and Shaun Foudy
Defendant:
Edna Almeida Rice and Miami-Dade County
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
