Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv12939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02711
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01030
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00502
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv03586
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00441
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Alonso-Rodriguez et al v. Alsonso-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2025cv01475
Plaintiff:
ADCOM Group, Inc., Debbie Alonso-Rodriguez, Stephanie Vilella-Alonso and others
Defendant:
Supermercado Mr. Special, Inc., SA INVESTMENTS, LLC, Edwin Alonso-Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rodriguez Angel v. Garland
as 24-6970
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
LUIS ALONSO RODRIGUEZ ANGEL
USA v. Rodriguez
as 24-50261
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Leonardo Alonso Rodriguez
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10557
Plaintiff:
ALONSO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
