Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Deans v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Donshea O'Niess Deans
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Gregory L. Holloway, Warden Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Horne et al
as 7:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Johnathan S. Horne, D. Rose, Brian Vanover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Horne et al
as 7:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Johnathan S. Horne, Daniel A. Rollins, Daniel C. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elvis Jones v. The Virginia ACA
as 20-6267
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, THE AMERICAN CORRECTIONS ASSOCIATION, THE VIRGINIA ACA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELVIS WAYNE JONES
Elvis Jones v. ACA
as 20-6255
Defendant / Appellee:
POLUNSKY FACULTY, POLUNSKY AUDITS, THE VIRGINIA CONTROLLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELVIS WAYNE JONES
Jones v. The American Corrections Association
as 2:2019cv00100
Defendant:
The American Corrections Association
Plaintiff:
Elvis Wayne Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gazo v. Chesapeake Detention Facility et al
as 8:2018cv03934
Defendant:
Phone Service Provider of Record, American Correctional Association, Chesapeake Detention Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Makusha Gazo and Makusha Gozo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Banks v. Sacaranto et al
as 5:2016hc02135
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
A. Sacaranto, J. Walker, A. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Hylton
as 15-7589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HYLTON, CDUSM, U. S. Marshal Service, D. LAWHORNE, Sheriff, STERNS, Chief and others
Chadwick v. Cummings et al
as 1:2013cv00821
Plaintiff:
Claude Wayne Chadwick
Defendant:
Sam R. Cummings, Scott Frost, Sim Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
