Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Citibank, N.A. v. Caito
as 20-1100
Defendant / Appellant:
KATHERINE L. CAITO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITIBANK, as Trustee for American Home Mortgage Assets Trust 2006-3 Mortgage-Backed Pass-through Certificates Series 2006-3
James Ortiz, et al v. State of California, et al
as 18-56097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ORTIZ and YOLANDA Y. ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and CITIBANK, N.A., as Trustee for American Home Mortgage Assets Trust 2006-3, Mortgage Backed Pass Through Certificates Series 2006-3
Citibank, N.A. as Trustee v. Caito
as 1:2018cv00427
Plaintiff:
Citibank, N.A. as Trustee for American Home Mortgage Assets Trust 2006-3, Mortgage Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-3 and Citibank, N.A.
Defendant:
Katherine L. Caito
Interested Party:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caito v. Citibank, et al
as 15-1947
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE L. CAITO
Defendant / Appellee:
CITIBANK, as Trustee for American Home Mortgage Assets Trust 2006-3 Mortgage-Backed Pass-through Certificates Series 2006-3 and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Caito v. Citibank, et al
as 15-1947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHERINE L. CAITO
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIBANK, as Trustee for American Home Mortgage Assets Trust 2006-3 Mortgage-Backed Pass-through Certficates Series 2006-3 and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Haleh Merrikh v. American Home Mortgage Asset
as 13-1572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HALEH MERRIKH
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE ASSETS TRUST 2006-3, c/o Citibank, N.A., as trustee and SURETY TRUSTEES, LLC
Merrikh v. American Home Mortgage Assets Trust 2006-3 et al
as 1:2013cv00209
Plaintiff:
Haleh Merrikh
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Assets Trust 2006-3 and Surety Trustees, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
