Cases 1 - 10 of 163,339
Keita v. Kangethe et al
as 1:2024cv02104
Plaintiff:
Margaret Keita
Defendant:
Emily Wagikuyu Kangethe, George Kinyanjui Kangethe and Heath Bertram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Dean v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Joeann Dean
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., ABC Corps #1-3 and John Does # 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Smith et al v. Bains et al
as 1:2024cv02102
Plaintiff:
Henrietta Smith and Nickeil Bethea-Smith
Defendant:
Stacey Bains, Kara Padgett, Amanda Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nicholson v. Continental Casualty Company
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Chris G. Nicholson
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Nichols v. Walmart Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Doretha Nichols
Defendant:
Walmart Inc and Walmart Claim Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NelNet Program et al v. Dooley
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
NelNet Program and Antonio Deshone Dooley
Defendant:
Antonio D. Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kemoa Jones
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TUCKER v. HARRIS et al
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
READERLYNN CARTER TUCKER
Defendant:
MARK HARRIS, ALETHEA HARRIS, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
