Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Preston Martin-Richardson v. King County Correctional Facility, et al
as 23-35402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRESTON EUGENE MARTIN-RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KING COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN/JANE DOE, Warden, King County Correctional Facility, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-20, Director of Operations/Management and others
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00587
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Quincey Sanders, Paul Alvin Womack, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Gregory L. Reaser and others
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Steven T. Marshall, Louis V. Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00929
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Treundous Qwavon Davis, Dameon Tunnell Stewart and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson King, Sharon Folks, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Steven Christopher Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinchon v. Walker et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00892
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson King, Kay Ivey, Leigh Gwathney and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lewis Pinchon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv16564
Defendant:
C. LEE, FCI FORT DIX, NJ, MR. ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv07233
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON KING
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03868
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
King v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv05126
Petitioner:
Anderson King
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. USA
as 1:2016cv03403
Petitioner:
Anderson King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
