Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SALAZAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04010
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ANDRES SALAZAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SALAZAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv64369
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
YRINEO ANDRE SALAZAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andres Salazar v. Clougherty Packing, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv09484
Defendant:
Clougherty Packing, LLC, Does and Hormel Foods Corporation
Plaintiff:
Andres Salazar
Baker v. City of Loveland, et al
as 16-1435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOVELAND, LOVELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICK ARNOLD, in official and individual capacity and others
Salazar v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2015cv01097
Plaintiff:
Andres Salazar
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Salazar v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00335
Plaintiff:
Andres Salazar
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Baker v. City of Loveland, et al
as 1:2015cv01920
Plaintiff:
Brandon Baker
Defendant:
City of Loveland , Loveland Police Dept. , Rick Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. City of Loveland et al
as 1:2015cv01864
Plaintiff:
Brandon Baker
Defendant:
City of Loveland , Loveland Police Dept , Gordon McGlaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salazar v. 2805 East Bay Corp.
as 8:2014cv01429
Plaintiff:
Andres Salazar
Defendant:
2805 East Bay Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
