Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
P.B. v. Burke County Public Schools Board of Education et al
as 1:2012cv00334
Consolidated Plaintiff:
A.B and M.B.
Plaintiff:
P. B.
Defendant:
Michael Andrew Alexander, Linda Bradshaw, Burke County Public Schools Board of Education and others
Petitioner:
Guardian Ad Litem Peggy M. Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STATE OF INDIANA et al v. THE INDIANA GAMING COMMISSION et al
as 1:2009cv01396
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ADOLPH and STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
ANDREW ALEXANDER, ADINA CLOUD, STEVE FERGUSON and others
317) 232-7979 (fax:
Eric James Beaver
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Alexander et al v. Santos et al
as 1:2009cv00193
Plaintiff:
Richard Andrew Alexander, Dante Balsimo, Robert A. Bates and others
Defendant:
Loida Bumanglag Santos, Grace Bumanglag Santos, George Ronald E. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
