Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PINATEL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22403
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DAWSON PINATEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Judy Smith-Dandridge v. Jarrett Geanolous, et al
as 21-2459
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Dominguez, Joseph Jennings, John Doe, Defendants 1-6 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Judy Lynn Smith-Dandridge, as Administratrix of the Estate of Andrew Dawson Bell, Deceased
DAWSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04238
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MACK ANDREW DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ronald Oslin Bobb Semple v. Kanye West et al
as 2:2019cv01682
Defendant:
Scott R Seguro Mescudi, Bryan M Attmore, Tyrone W Griffin, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald O Bobb-Semple
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
DAWSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv13516
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DAWSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrew Dawson v. HITCO Carbon Composites, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07337
Defendant:
HITCO Carbon Composites, Inc, HITCO Carbon Composites, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Dawson v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2016cv00311
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dawson
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Geoffrey Anderson v. Andrew Dawson, et al
as 11-15993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEOFFREY H. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW DAWSON, TIM RUTH, CARL BENNETT and others
:
SERVICE
ANDERSON v. LOFLAND
as 4:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
GEOFFREY H ANDERSON
Defendant:
HOLLY LOFLAND, ANDREW DAWSON and TIM RUTH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
