Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Lopez v. County of Orange, et al.
as 26-3151
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LOPEZ
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, ANDREW DO, FRANK KIM and others
MITCHELL v. STONE et al
as 5:2026cv00193
Plaintiff:
ROSALIND MITCHELL
Defendant:
JIMMY STONE and DARRELL ANDREWS doing business as OLE SCHOOL TRANSPORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lopez v. County of Orange, et al.
as 26-1969
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LOPEZ
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT, DOES 1-100 and others
Lopez v. County of Orange, et al.
as 26-1341
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LOPEZ
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, ANDREW DO, Board Supervisor, individual capacity, FRANK KIM, Orange County Chief Executive Officer, individual capacity and others
Lopez v. County of Orange, et al.
as 26-328
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LOPEZ
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, ANDREW DO, Board Supervisor, individual capacity, FRANK KIM, ATTORNEY, Orange County Chief Executive Officer, individual capacity and others
Arthur Lopez v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2026cv00087
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lopez
Defendant:
County of Orange, Andrew Do, Frank Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanaz Derakhshani Jan v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2026cv00072
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, DONALD BARNES, DONALD P. WAGNER and others
Plaintiff:
SANAZ DERAKHSHANI JAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lopez v. County of Orange et al
as 3:2025cv02996
Defendant:
County of Orange, Andrew Do, Frank Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Art Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Donathan v. Do, et al.
as 25-4598
Plaintiff:
DEBORA DONATHAN
Defendant:
ANDREW DO, CHERI PHAM, KATHLEEN O'LEARY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
