Cases 41 - 50 of 231
Johnson v. Keith et al
as 6:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
Phillip Keith, State Automobile Mutual Insurance Companies and Auto Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Andra et al v. Arbon et al
as 1:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Lance Steven Andra, Mark Andrew Johnson and Candi Lee
Defendant:
Ryan Arbon, Jess Anderson, Brandon Mortensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Michael Johnson v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 22-1695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Benny Magness, Board of Correction, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
(HC) Johnson v. State of California
as 2:2022cv00536
Petitioner:
Andrew Johnson, Andrew D. Johnson and Andrew Cliff Johnson
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04033
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. State of California
as 3:2022cv01569
Petitioner:
Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson
as 5:2022cv00876
Plaintiff:
Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Paige et al
as 1:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
Demarcus Earl Paige, P & S Transport, Prime Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
BRETT ANDREW JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
