Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MCCORMICK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15349
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MCCORMICK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jody McCormick, et al v. Thomas Heathcock, et al
as 21-17134
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JODY MCCORMICK, on her own behalf and as person representative of the Estate of Andrew McCormick and STEVEN MCCORMICK, father of Andrew McCormick
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS HEATHCOCK
Defendant:
EDUARDO CARDENAS and STATE OF ARIZONA
Jody McCormick, et al v. Eduardo Cardenas, et al
as 21-17133
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JODY MCCORMICK, on her own behalf and as person representative of the Estate of Andrew McCormick and STEVEN MCCORMICK, father of Andrew McCormick
Defendant / Appellant:
EDUARDO CARDENAS
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA and THOMAS HEATHCOCK
Romero v. Adams County et al
as 1:2021cv02806
Plaintiff:
Jason Romero
Defendant:
Adams County, Richard Reigenborn, Ian Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCORMICK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66664
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MCCORMICK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrew McCormick v. Kline
as 16-2775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW MCCORMICK
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER KLINE, SCI Somerset
MCCORMICK v. OFFICER KLINE
as 3:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MCCORMICK
Defendant:
OFFICER KLINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCORMICK v. OFFICER FURDA et al
as 3:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MCCORMICK
Defendant:
OFFICER FURDA, NURSE JOHNSON, NURSE AMADA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MCCORMICK v. FLISZAO et al
as 2:2012cv00354
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MCCORMICK
Defendant:
C. FLISZAO, S. STEWART, SCI GRATERFORD PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
