Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Eckerd v. Jump
as 2:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Andrew William Eckerd
Respondent:
E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Curtis Andrew Williams
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Tyrone Oliver, Michael W. Nail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Jump et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Rebecca J. Walden, Roger B. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lungaho v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Mujera Benjamin Lungaho
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Dane Barnum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Girrot et al
as 3:2023cv01899
Plaintiff:
Kyle Andrew Williams
Defendant:
Girrot, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Beasley
as 2:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
Andrew William Echerd and Andrew William Eckerd
Respondent:
Jacob Beasley
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eckerd v. Lush et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Nigel Lush, Keith Higgins, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Walker
as 1:2022cv06550
Petitioner:
Andrew Williams
Respondent:
Warden S. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayo v. Walker
as 1:2022cv05810
Petitioner:
Maurice Mayo, William Harris, Randolph Maxwell and others
Respondent:
Warden S. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eckerd v. Gunderson et al
as 2:2021cv00097
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd and Drew
Defendant:
Jeff Gunderson and E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
