Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Whitfield v. McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, P.C
as 20-590
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Torres, Jr., Trustee/P/O/A for al-el, Lorren Vincente Whitfield d/b/a Lorren V. Whitfield - Trust
Defendant:
LeClaire/Ryan N.A., John and Jane Does 1-25 and PNC N.A.
Defendant / Appellee:
McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, P.C.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lorren V. Whitfield, Settlor/Trustee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres-Ortiz v. US
as 19-1078
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANGEL LUIS TORRES-ORTIZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Whitfield et al v. McClanahan et al
as 1:2019cv00176
Defendant:
Karen B. Rothenberg, Michael Santangelo, Robert Meyerson and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Torres, Jr. and Lorren V. Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Whitfield et al v. McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, P.C. et al
as 1:2018cv07259
Defendant:
LeClaire/Ryan N.A., McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, P.C., John and Jane Does 1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Torres, Jr., Lorren V. Whitfield and Angel Luis Torres, Jr. Trustee/P/O/A for al-el, Lorren Vincente Whitfield d/b/a Lorren V. Whitfield - Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Torres-Ortiz v. USA
as 3:2017cv01275
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Angel Luis Torres-Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Torres v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv20569
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Torres
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Lnu
as 10-2029
Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Fnu Lnu, AKA Angel Luis Torres Rivera, AKA Angel L. Rivera, AKA Angel River, AKA Angel Torres, AKA Angel Luis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
