Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ORTIZ-LUGO v. BRITTIAN et al
as 5:2022cv00325
Petitioner:
JULIO ANGEL ORTIZ-LUGO
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTIAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCFADDEN v. APPLE INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03779
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER BRIAN QUIRPLE, POLICE OFFICER JASON REID, POLICE OFFICER ANGEL ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff:
TALLI J. MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ v. KLEMM et al
as 2:2018cv00547
Plaintiff:
LUIS ANGEL ORTIZ
Defendant:
ULLI/ULRICH KLEMM and KIRT W. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02940
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ORTIZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BOYER v. GRAHAM et al
as 2:2015cv01073
Plaintiff:
ANDRE BOYER
Defendant:
WURLIN GRAHAM and ANGEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VIKING INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
VIKING INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN
Defendant:
ANGEL ORTIZ, ANGEL CARTAGENA, JUAN SALVADOR MATOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
REYES v. RAMSEY et al
as 2:2013cv06916
Plaintiff:
RAUL REYES
Defendant:
CHARLES RAMSEY, KEVIN BETHEL, WILLIAM V. FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. SISCA et al
as 2:2013cv06815
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARRIS
Defendant:
JOSEPH SISCA, ANGEL ORTIZ, JOHN DOES 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUGUSTINE et al v. RAMSEY et al
as 2:2013cv06606
Plaintiff:
NOEL AUGUSTINE , MICHAEL BARANKOVICH , MOSHE BITTERMAN and others
Defendant:
CHARLES RAMSEY, KEVIN BETHEL, WILLIAM V. FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv05086
Plaintiff:
WURLIN GRAHAM
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANDRE BOYER and ANGEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
